danielvf 14 hours ago

It's buried deep in the article, but what made PC Connection amazing was the shipping.

You could phone call a human in the wee hours of the morning, and have it show up later that same day. Or pay only a little and have it into two days. Compared to every other mail-order retailer in the universe at the time, it was insane, to have such selection and speed.

  • WillAdams 13 hours ago

    Yeah, apparently the warehouse which made this workable was in Kingston, Tenn. adjacent to the FedEx Hub, so things could go straight to the plane which was taking them to the FedEx distributor closest to the delivery address.

    Still have the Wacom ArtZ I bought from them in the wee hours of a Monday morning when I decided I desperately had to have one.

4ggr0 14 hours ago

I'd love to have a poster of the picture in the "PC Preppy" advert from October 1984[0]. I wonder how I could aquire the highest resolution possible...

Love raccoons <3

[0] https://d1pkj6r18lfvhs.archive.is/BxyNA/d05003d20de92f868e5b...

  • kevin_thibedeau 11 hours ago

    There are ML upscalers optimized for illustrations you can run locally for these scenarios. Doesn't require bleeding edge hardware either.

    • 4ggr0 an hour ago

      true, good idea. got an RTX3080 at home and tinkered around with stable diffusion when it came out. maybe that's my first genuine use-case after all this time. i first want to contact the artist, though. as far as i understand, artists tend to be weirded out if people start AIing their work.

zombot an hour ago

What ever became of the Private Eye headset? Seems amazing for the time.

BambooBandit 15 hours ago

"The point of the characters, it said, was to add 'a human touch to high tech.'"

Something we need today, too

agarren 2 hours ago

AST had raccoons on one or two of his books, earlier editions of “ Operating Systems Design and Implementation” iirc. I always thought cartoon raccoons on the cover of a technical text book seemed like an odd choice. I wonder if there’s a connection?

cm2012 14 hours ago

I absolutely adore this article on computer ad history.

ChrisMarshallNY 13 hours ago

It's kind of odd, seeing the MicroWarehouse Girl.

I very much remember her, smiling out from many different magazines.

  • lttlrck 5 hours ago

    Immediately recognized her. She must have made it across the pond to the UK. Maybe it was BYTE. Loved that magazine.

mjevans 15 hours ago

Might be hugged to death, no current copies on archive.org or archive.today :(

fullshark 16 hours ago

Feeling cognitive dissonance given this is making me feel nostalgic for advertising.

  • mamcx 15 hours ago

    True, before was cool to see the ads.

    Now, skip all!

    • ToucanLoucan 9 hours ago

      Before they were FUCKING EVERYWHERE.

      Like Christ. I wouldn't be as anti-ad as I am if it didn't feel like I was being screeched at continuously from when I wake to when I sleep to BUY BUY BUY BUY BUY BUY BUY

  • ars 12 hours ago

    It's because they are simply advertising a product. It's the "lifestyle" ads that people hate so much.

rideontime 16 hours ago

The AI-generated raccoon in 2024 sure is a gut punch after seeing the lovingly rendered art from yesteryear. Completely devoid of the personality of the originals, even in the Christmas card, he can only dream of living up to the standard they set.

  • mrob 15 hours ago

    There's an inconsistent mix of human hands and raccoon paws in the same image. I thought diffusion models could do inpainting of pre-existing images. If somebody actually cared they could have picked one and erased and regenerated the other.

    • gwern 10 hours ago

      If you mean https://i0.wp.com/technologizer.com/home/wp-content/uploads/... It's definitely a weird image. The hands are oddly accurate, and the geometry in the background is also unusually straight and correct for a low-end corporate 2024 Bing DALL-E or Stable Diffusion slop image. And in the bottom image, the food is way too sharp, and the sci-fi text UI is also way too accurate.

      So I am suspicious something else is going on to produce the overall uncanny effect of wrongness: possibly they used Photoshop to paste on a bunch of unrelated images to some low-quality stock-art backgrounds?

      • userbinator an hour ago

        I think it's AI + human editing.

    • pfdietz 15 hours ago

      Perhaps the model was trained on too much furry art?

      • indrora 15 hours ago

        It wouldn't make that sort of mistake then.

        • mystified5016 14 hours ago

          Furry art is not in any way consistent with the use of human and animal anatomy. You'll absolutely see a mix of paws and hands

bregma 14 hours ago

Not a single one of those images depict a single trash panda eating garbage, having babies in an attic, or defecating all over the house.

  • linksnapzz 13 hours ago

    Those raccoons work on the IT side; only the more presentable marketing raccoons get into catalog pics.

    Having a PC Connection catalog w/ raccoons doing more stereotypical rural NH shenanigans (driving a snowmobile drunk on NightTrain; fleeing the cops on dirtbikes, operating bootleg roadside fireworks stands...) might've been hard to get approval for.

  • roughly 13 hours ago

    They’ve got a life outside of work, you know.

sgt 14 hours ago

I asked ChatGPT to imagine pretty much the same scene as that top drawing. It's such a great example of LLM's - having zero understanding of the real world - has the racoons looking at the computer but from behind it.

https://sdmntprwestus.oaiusercontent.com/files/00000000-c810...

  • CursedSilicon 14 hours ago

    They look so dead eyed and bland, too. AI "art" just makes me sad.

    There's so many furry artists out there, just pay one of them to draw raccoons and computers. You'll get something created with love and beauty that expresses something real

    https://cursedsilicon.net/racc.png

  • gwern 10 hours ago

    Your link is already broken.

  • hhh 14 hours ago

    missing the entire point of the article award

    • Dylan16807 12 hours ago

      Did you read the whole comment? I need you to explain why you think that.